It must be stressed that the Qur′an is accurate about many, many things, but
accuracy does not necessarily mean that a book is a divine revelation. In fact,
accuracy is only one of the criteria for divine revelations. For instance, the
telephone book is accurate, but that does not mean that it is divinely revealed.
The real problem lies in that one must establish some proof of the source the
Qur′an′s information. The emphasis is in the other direction, in that the burden
of proof is on the reader. One cannot simply deny the Qur′an′s authenticity
without sufficient proof. If, indeed, one finds a mistake, then one has the
right to disqualify it. This is exactly what the Qur′an encourages.
Looking for Mistakes
Once a man came up to me after a lecture I delivered in South Africa. He was
very angry about what I had said, and so he claimed, “I am going to go home
tonight and find a mistake in the Qur′an.” Of course, I said, “Congratulations.
That is the most intelligent thing that you have said.” Certainly, this is the
approach Muslims need to take with those who doubt the Qur′an′s authenticity,
because the Qur′an itself offers the same challenge. And inevitably, after
accepting its challenge and discovering that it is true, these people will come
to believe it because they could not disqualify it. In essence, the Qur′an earns
their respect because they themselves have had to verify its authenticity.
An essential fact that cannot be reiterated enough concerning the authenticity
of the Qur′an is that one′s inability to explain a phenomenon oneself does not
require one′s acceptance of the phenomenon′s existence or another person′s
explanation of it. Specifically, just because one cannot explain something does
not mean that one has to accept someone else′s explanation. However, the
person′s refusal of other explanations returns the burden of proof back on
himself to find a feasible answer. This general theory applies to numerous
concepts in life but fits most wonderfully with the Qur′anic challenge, for it
creates a difficulty for one who says, “I do not believe it.” At the onset of
refusal one immediately has an obligation to find an explanation oneself if one
feels others′ answers are inadequate.
In fact, in one particular Qur′anic verse that I have always seen mistranslated
into English, Allah mentions a man who heard the truth explained to him. It
states that he was derelict in his duty because after he heard the information,
he left without checking the verity of what he had heard. In other words, one is
guilty if one hears something and does not research it and check to see whether
it is true. One is supposed to process all information and decide what is
garbage to be thrown out and what is worthwhile information to be kept and
benefited from immediately or even at a later date.
One cannot just let it rattle around in one′s head. It must be put in the proper
categories and approached from that point of view. For example, if the
information is still speculative, then one must discern whether it′s closer to
being true or false. But if all the facts have been presented, then one must
decide absolutely between these two options. And even if one is not positive
about the authenticity of the information, one is still required to process all
the information and make the admission that one just does not know for sure.
Although this last point appears to be futile, in actuality, it is beneficial to
the arrival at a positive conclusion at a later time in that it forces the
person to at least recognize, research, and review the facts.
This familiarity with the information will give the person “the edge” when
future discoveries are made and additional information is presented. The
important thing is that one deals with the facts and does not simply discard
them out of empathy and disinterest.
Exhausting the Alternatives
The real certainty about the truthfulness of the Qur′an is evident in the
confidence that is prevalent throughout it, and this confidence comes from a
different approach: exhausting the alternatives.” In essence, the Qur′an states,
“This book is a divine revelation; if you do not believe that, then what is it?”
In other words, the reader is challenged to come up with some other explanation.
Here is a book made of paper and ink. Where did it come from? It says it is a
divine revelation; if it is not, then what is its source? The interesting fact
is that no one has yet come up with an explanation that works. In fact, all
alternatives have been exhausted. As has been well established by non-Muslims,
these alternatives basically are reduced to two mutually exclusive schools of
thought, insisting on one or the other.
On one hand, there exists a large group of people who have researched the Qur′an
for hundreds of years and who claim, “One thing we know for sure: That man,
Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him), thought he was a prophet. He was
crazy!” They are convinced that Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) was
fooled somehow. Then on the other hand, there is a group that alleges, “Because
of this evidence, one thing we know for sure is that that man, Muhammad (peace
and blessings be upon him), was a liar!” Ironically, these two groups never seem
to get together without contradictions.
In fact, many references to Islam usually claim both theories. They start out by
stating that Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) was crazy and then end
by saying he was a liar. They never seem to realize that he could not have been
both! For example, if one is deluded and really thinks that he is a prophet,
then he does not sit up late at night planning, “How will I fool the people
tomorrow so that they think I am a prophet?” He truly believes that he is a
prophet, and he trusts that the answer will be given to him by revelation.
The Critic′s Trail
As a matter of fact, a great deal of the Qur′an came in answer to questions.
Someone would ask Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) a question, and the
revelation would come with the answer to it. Certainly, if someone is crazy and
believes that an angel put words in his ear, then when someone asks him a
question, he thinks that the angel will give him the answer. Because he is
crazy, he really thinks that. He does not tell someone to wait a short while and
then run to his friends and ask them, “Does anyone know the answer?” This type
of behavior is characteristic of someone who does not believe that he is a
prophet. What the non-Muslims refuse to accept is that you cannot have it both
ways. One can be deluded, or one can be a liar. One can be either one or neither
one, but one certainly cannot be both! The emphasis is on the fact that they are
unquestionably mutually exclusive personality traits.
The following scenario is a good example of the kind of circle that non-Muslims
go around in constantly. If you ask one of them, “What is the origin of the
Qur′an?” he tells you that it originated from the mind of a man who was crazy.
Then you ask him, “If it came from his head, then where did he get the
information contained in it? Certainly the Qur′an mentions many things with
which the Arabs were not familiar.” So in order to explain the fact that you
bring him, he changes his position and says, “Well, maybe he was not crazy.
Maybe some foreigner brought him the information. So he lied and told people
that he was a prophet.” At this point then you have to ask him, “If Muhammad was
a liar, then where did he get his confidence? Why did he behave as though he
really thought he was a prophet?” Finally backed into a corner, like a cat he
quickly lashes out with the first response that comes to his mind. Forgetting
that he has already exhausted that possibility, he claims, “Well, maybe he
wasn′t a liar. He was probably crazy and really thought that he was a prophet.”
And thus he begins the futile cycle again.
is a Canadian former Christian theologian and minister who converted to
Islam. He now works on spreading and preaching Islam to the world.
Authenticity of the Qur′an: Another Approach
By Dr. Gary Miller
As has already been mentioned, there is much information contained in the Qur′an
whose source cannot be attributed to anyone other than Allah. For example, who
told Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) about the wall of Dhul
Qarnayn�a place hundreds of miles to the north? Who told him about
embryology? When people assemble facts such as these, if they are not willing to
attribute their existence to a divine source, they automatically resort to the
assumption someone brought Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) the
information and that he used it to fool the people. However, this theory can
easily be disproved with one simple question: “If Muhammad (peace and blessings
be upon him) was a liar, where did he get his confidence? Why did he tell some
people outright to their face what others could never say?” Such confidence
depends completely upon being convinced that one has a true, divine revelation.
A Revelation: Abu Lahab
Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) had an uncle by the name of
Abu Lahab. This man hated Islam to such an extent that he used to follow the
Prophet around in order to discredit him. If Abu Lahab saw the Prophet (peace
and blessings be upon him) speaking to a stranger, he would wait until they
parted and he would go to the stranger and ask him, “What did he tell you? Did
he say, ′Black?′ Well, it′s white. Did he say ′morning?′ Well, it′s night.” He
faithfully said the exact opposite of whatever he heard Muhammad (peace and
blessings be upon him) and the Muslims say.
However, about ten years before Abu Lahab died, a little chapter in the Qur′an
(Surat Al-Masad, 111) was revealed about him. It distinctly stated that he would
go to the fire (Hell). In other words, it affirmed that he would never become a
Muslim and would, therefore, be condemned forever. For ten years, all Abu Lahab
had to do was say, “I heard that it has been revealed to Muhammad that I will
never change�that I will never become a Muslim and will enter the Hellfire.
Well, I want to become Muslim now. How do you like that? What do you think of
your divine revelation now?” But he never did that. And yet, that is exactly the
kind of behavior one would have expected from him, since he always sought to
In essence, Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said, “You hate me and
you want to finish me? Here, say these words and I am finished. Come on, say
them!” But Abu Lahab never said them. Ten years! And in all that time he never
accepted Islam or even became sympathetic to the Islamic cause.
How could Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) have possibly known for
sure that Abu Lahab would fulfill the Qur′anic revelation if he (Muhammad) was
not truly the messenger of Allah? How could he possibly have been so confident
as to give someone 10 years to discredit his claim of Prophethood? The only
answer is that he was Allah′s messenger; for in order to put forth such a risky
challenge, one has to be entirely convinced that one has a divine revelation.
Another example of the confidence which Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon
him) had in his own Prophethood and, consequently, in the divine protection of
himself and his message, was when he left Makkah and hid in a cave with Abu Bakr
(may Allah be pleased with him) during their emigration from Makkah to Madinah.
The two clearly saw people coming to kill them, Abu Bakr was afraid. Certainly,
if Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) was a liar, a forger, and one who
was trying to fool the people into believing that he was a prophet, one would
have expected him to say in such a circumstance to his friend, “Hey, Abu Bakr,
see if you can find a back way out of this cave.” Or, “Squat down in that corner
over there and keep quiet.” Yet, in fact, what he said to Abu Bakr clearly
illustrated his confidence. He told him, “Relax! Allah is with us and Allah will
save us!” Now, if one knows that one is fooling the people, where does one get
this kind of attitude? In fact, such a frame of mind is not characteristic of a
liar or a forger at all.
So, as has been previously mentioned, the non-Muslims go around and around in a
circle, searching for a way out�some way to explain the findings in the Qur′an
without attributing them to their proper source. On one hand, they tell you on
Monday, Wednesday, and Friday that “the man was a liar,” and on the other hand,
on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday they tell you that “he was crazy.” What they
refuse to accept is that one cannot have it both ways; yet they need both
theories, both excuses to explain the information in the Qur′an.
An Encounter with a Minister
About seven years ago, I had a minister over to my home. In the particular room
that we were sitting in, there was a Qur′an on the table, face down, and so the
minister was not aware of which book it was. In the midst of a discussion, I
pointed to the Qur′an and said, “I have confidence in that book.” Looking at the
Qur′an but not knowing which book it was, he replied, “Well, I tell you, if that
book is not the Bible, it was written by a man!” In response to his statement, I
said, “Let me tell you something about what is in that book.” And in just three
to four minutes, I related to him a few things contained in the Qur′an. After
just those three or four minutes, he completely changed his position and
declared, “You are right.A man did not write that book, the Devil wrote it!”
Indeed, possessing such an attitude is very unfortunate, for many reasons. For
one thing, it is a very quick and cheap excuse. It is an instant exit out of an
As a matter of fact, there is a famous story in the Bible that mentions how one
day, some of the Jews were witnesses when Jesus (peace and blessings be upon
him) raised a man from the dead. The man had been dead for four days, yet when
Jesus arrived, he simply said, “Get up!” and the man arose and walked away. At
such a sight, some of the Jews who were watching said disbelievingly, “This is
the Devil. The Devil helped him!” Now this story is rehearsed very often in
churches all over the world, and people cry big tears over it, saying, “Oh, if I
had been there, I would not have been as stupid as the Jews!” Yet, ironically,
these people do exactly what the Jews did when in just three minutes you show
them only a small part of the Qur′an and all they can say is, “Oh, the Devil did
it. The devil wrote that book!” Because they are truly backed into a corner and
have no other viable answer, they resort to the quickest and cheapest excuse
Dr. Gary Miller is a Canadian former Christian theologian and minister who converted to
Islam. He now works on spreading and preaching Islam to the world.