Tuesday, 03 Aug 2010 12:15 PM
http://www.newsmax.com/Koch/hamid--karzai--afghanistan--al--qaida--taliban/2010/08/03/id/366454
Webmaster, So we are sending 100,000 American soldiers, to fight under 400 al-Qaida members
Isn't that really stupid?
By: Edward Koch
The perpetual
question, “Why are we in Afghanistan now?” was answered by Vice President
Joe Biden. On Aug. 1, The New York Times reported that Vice President Biden
said Thursday on NBC, “We are in Afghanistan for one express purpose:
al-Qaida. Al-Qaida exists in those mountains between Afghanistan and
Pakistan. We are not there to nation-build. We’re not out there deciding
we’re going to turn this into a Jeffersonian democracy and build that
country.”
According to Leon Panetta, director of the CIA, in an interview on ABC’s
“This Week,” on June 27, “the number of al-Qaida [in Afghanistan] is
actually relatively small. At most, we’re looking at
50 to 100, maybe less.”
In Pakistan, the estimate of al-Qaida’s numbers is about
300 operatives.
The New York Times of July 1 reported, “Michael E. Leiter, one of the
country’s top counterterrorism officials, said Wednesday that American
intelligence officials now estimated that there were somewhat ‘more than
300’ al-Qaida leaders and fighters hiding in Pakistan’s tribal areas, a rare
public assessment of the strength of the terrorist group that is the central
target of President Obama’s war strategy.”
We will have 100,000 American
soldiers in Afghanistan by the end of
this summer. We are suffering enormous casualties which rise each month.
In the month of July, we suffered a record 66 deaths and 78 injuries. The
most recent U.S. appropriation bill signed by President Obama on July 29
included $37 billion for the ongoing wars in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The
expenditure of blood and treasure, if Joe Biden is correct, is way out of
proportion.
President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan, who is denounced by almost everyone
as presiding over a corrupt government, and not respected by huge numbers of
Afghans, recently said that he expects the American army to remain in and
protect his country’s borders until 2014 when the Afghan army will finally
be able to do the job.
That means a 13-year war at a minimum. If you can’t train an Afghan army in
nine years, who believes another four will do the job?
The problem is that Afghanistan is in a civil war and the Taliban opponents
of the government apparently have the support of the people to a greater
extent than does the government. Somewhat analogous to what occurred in
Vietnam.
The government of South Vietnam lacked support by its people. The government
of North Vietnam, regrettably, had the support of its people.
The religious practices — Shariah — that offends Westerners is apparently
accepted by a majority of the Afghan people. Why don’t we leave and let the
Afghan people decide the outcome of that civil war among themselves?
If Vice President Biden is speaking for the Obama administration, there is
hope that reason will prevail. I fear he is not.
Al-Qaida is in 62 countries. Probably in the U.S. itself, there are more
than 50 putative operatives, some of whom undoubtedly entered the U.S.
illegally across our southern border.
We are in for a war that could last 30 years or more. It should not be a
land war with our soldiers locked in battle in a place when the population
hates us. Instead, let us use drones, aircraft, and special forces from
offshore.
© Newsmax. All rights reserved.
|
[ Fall of USA] [ Home ] [ Site Map ] |